Difference between revisions of "Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink (eds.) (2000) Tulipomania DotCom Reader"

From Domains, Publics and Access
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Miguel moved page Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink (2000) Tulipomania DotCom Reader to [[Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink (eds.) (2000) Tulipomania DotCom R...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
+
[[File: Tulipomania_DotCom_Reader-img.jpg | thumbnail | right]]
  
Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
+
== <small>'''Abstract'''</small> ==
  
 +
In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement.
  
Resumen:In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement.
+
== <small>'''File'''</small> ==
  
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]]
+
[[File: Tulipomania_DotCom_Reader.pdf]]
[[Categoría:Institute of Network Cultures]]
+
 
[[Categoría:Ted Byfield]]
+
== <small>'''Source'''</small> ==
[[Categoría:Menno Hurenkamp]]
+
 
[[Categoría:Andreas Kallfelz]]
+
[[Institute_of_Network_Cultures|Institute of Network Cultures]]
[[Categoría:Eric Kluitenberg]]
+
 
[[Categoría:Geert Lovink]]
+
== <small>'''Links'''</small> ==
[[Categoría:Inglés]]
+
 
[[Categoría:Holanda]]
+
'''URL:''' http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
[[Categoría:2000]]
+
 
 +
'''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Library]]
 +
[[Category:Institute of Network Cultures]]
 +
[[Category:Ted Byfield]]
 +
[[Category:Menno Hurenkamp]]
 +
[[Category:Andreas Kallfelz]]
 +
[[Category:Eric Kluitenberg]]
 +
[[Category:Geert Lovink]]
 +
[[Category:English]]
 +
[[Category:Holland]]
 +
[[Category:2000]]

Latest revision as of 18:26, 10 May 2017

Tulipomania DotCom Reader-img.jpg

Abstract

In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement.

File

File:Tulipomania DotCom Reader.pdf

Source

Institute of Network Cultures

Links

URL: http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/

Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/