Difference between revisions of "2003 - Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing - Patrick O. Brown (et al.)"

From Domains, Publics and Access
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(All revisions contained links to legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm, blanking)
Tag: Blanking
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Screenshot-legacy.earlham.edu 2017-04-28 19-21-49.png|thumbnail|right]]
 
  
== <small>'''Text'''</small> ==
 
 
Released June 20, 2003
 
 
'''Contents'''
 
* Summary of the April 11 meeting
 
* Definition of open access publication
 
* Statement of the Institutions and Funding Agencies working group
 
* Statement of the Libraries & Publishers working group
 
* Statement of Scientists and Scientific Societies working group
 
* List of participants
 
 
'''Summary of the April 11, 2003, Meeting on Open Access Publishing'''
 
 
The following statements of principle were drafted during a one-day meeting
 
held on April 11, 2003 at the headquarters of the Howard Hughes Medical
 
Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland. The purpose of this document is to stimulate
 
discussion within the biomedical research community on how to proceed, as
 
rapidly as possible, to the widely held goal of providing open access to the
 
primary scientific literature. Our goal was to agree on significant, concrete steps
 
that all relevant parties —the organizations that foster and support scientific
 
research, the scientists that generate the research results, the publishers who
 
facilitate the peer-review and distribution of results of the research, and the
 
scientists, librarians and other who depend on access to this knowledge— can
 
take to promote the rapid and efficient transition to open access publishing.
 
 
A list of the attendees is given following the statements of principle; they
 
participated as individuals and not necessarily as representatives of their
 
institutions. Thus, this statement, while reflecting the group consensus, should
 
not be interpreted as carrying the unqualified endorsement of each participant or
 
any position by their institutions.
 
 
Our intention is to reconvene an expanded group in a few months to draft a final
 
set of principles that we will then seek to have formally endorsed by funding
 
agencies, scientific societies, publishers, librarians, research institutions and
 
individual scientists as the accepted standard for publication of peer-reviewed
 
reports of original research in the biomedical sciences.
 
 
The document is divided into four sections: The first is a working definition of
 
open access publication. This is followed by the reports of three working groups.
 
 
'''Definition of Open Access Publication'''
 
 
An Open Access Publication[1] is one that meets the following two conditions:
 
 
1. The author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free,
 
irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy,
 
use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and
 
distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible
 
purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship[2], as well as the right
 
to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
 
 
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a
 
copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic
 
format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one
 
online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly
 
society, government agency, or other well-established organization that
 
seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and
 
long-term archiving (for the biomedical sciences, PubMed Central is such a
 
repository).
 
 
Notes:
 
 
1. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or
 
publishers.
 
 
2. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the
 
mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the
 
published work, as they do now.
 
 
'''Statement of the Institutions and Funding Agencies Working Group'''
 
 
Our organizations sponsor and nurture scientific research to promote the creation
 
and dissemination of new ideas and knowledge for the public benefit. We
 
recognize that publication of results is an essential part of scientific research and
 
the costs of publication are part of the cost of doing research. We already expect
 
that our faculty and grantees share their ideas and discoveries through
 
publication. This mission is only half-completed if the work is not made as widely
 
available and as useful to society as possible. The Internet has fundamentally
 
changed the practical and economic realities of distributing published scientific
 
knowledge and makes possible substantially increased access.
 
 
To realize the benefits of this change requires a corresponding fundamental
 
change in our policies regarding publication by our grantees and faculty:
 
 
1. We encourage our faculty/grant recipients to publish their work according
 
to the principles of the open access model, to maximize the access and
 
benefit to scientists, scholars and the public throughout the world.
 
 
2. We realize that moving to open and free access, though probably decreasing
 
total costs, may displace some costs to the individual researcher through
 
page charges, or to publishers through decreased revenues, and we pledge
 
to help defray these costs. To this end we agree to help fund the necessary
 
expenses of publication under the open access model of individual papers in
 
peer-reviewed journals (subject to reasonable limits based on market
 
conditions and services provided).
 
 
3. We reaffirm the principle that only the intrinsic merit of the work, and not
 
the title of the journal in which a candidate�s work is published, will be
 
considered in appointments, promotions, merit awards or grants.
 
 
4. We will regard a record of open access publication as evidence of service to
 
the community, in evaluation of applications for faculty appointments,
 
promotions and grants.
 
 
We adopt these policies in the expectation that the publishers of scientific works
 
share our desire to maximize public benefit from scientific knowledge and will
 
view these new policies as they are intended —an opportunity to work together
 
for the benefit of the scientific community and the public.
 
 
'''Statement of the Libraries & Publishers Working Group'''
 
 
We believe that open access will be an essential component of scientific
 
publishing in the future and that works reporting the results of current scientific
 
research should be as openly accessible and freely useable as possible. Libraries
 
and publishers should make every effort to hasten this transition in a fashion that
 
does not disrupt the orderly dissemination of scientific information.
 
 
Libraries propose to:
 
 
1. Develop and support mechanisms to make the transition to open access
 
publishing and to provide examples of these mechanisms to the community.
 
 
2. In our education and outreach activities, give high priority to teaching our
 
users about the benefits of open access publishing and open access
 
journals.
 
 
3. List and highlight open access journals in our catalogs and other relevant
 
databases.
 
 
Journal publishers propose to:
 
 
1. Commit to providing an open access option for any research article
 
published in any of the journals they publish.
 
 
2. Declare a specific timetable for transition of journals to open access
 
models.
 
 
3. Work with other publishers of open access works and interested parties to
 
develop tools for authors and publishers to facilitate publication of
 
manuscripts in standard electronic formats suitable for archival storage and
 
efficient searching.
 
 
4. Ensure that open access models requiring author fees lower barriers to
 
researchers at demonstrated financial disadvantage, particularly those from
 
developing countries.
 
 
'''Statement of Scientists and Scientific Societies Working Group'''
 
 
Scientific research is an interdependent process whereby each experiment is
 
informed by the results of others. The scientists who perform research and the
 
professional societies that represent them have a great interest in ensuring that
 
research results are disseminated as immediately, broadly and effectively as
 
possible. Electronic publication of research results offers the opportunity and the
 
obligation to share research results, ideas and discoveries freely with the
 
scientific community and the public.
 
 
Therefore:
 
 
1. We endorse the principles 1. of the open access model.
 
 
2. We recognize that publishing is a fundamental part of the research process,
 
and the costs of publishing are a fundamental cost of doing research.
 
 
3. Scientific societies agree to affirm their strong support for the open access
 
model and their commitment to ultimately achieve open access for all the
 
works they publish. They will share information on the steps they are taking
 
to achieve open access with the community they serve and with others who
 
might benefit from their experience.
 
 
4. Scientists agree to manifest their support for open access by selectively
 
publishing in, reviewing for and editing for open access journals and
 
journals that are effectively making the transition to open access.
 
 
5. Scientists agree to advocate changes in promotion and tenure evaluation in
 
order to recognize the community contribution of open access publishing
 
and to recognize the intrinsic merit of individual articles without regard to
 
the titles of the journals in which they appear.
 
 
6. Scientists and societies agree that education is an indispensable part of
 
achieving open access, and commit to educate their colleagues, members
 
and the public about the importance of open access and why they support
 
it.
 
 
'''List of Participants'''
 
 
Dr. Patrick O. Brown
 
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
 
Stanford University School of
 
Medicine, and Public Library of Science
 
 
Ms. Diane Cabell
 
Associate Director
 
The Berkman Center for Internet
 
& Society
 
at Harvard Law School
 
 
Dr. Aravinda Chakravarti
 
Director, McKusick-Nathans
 
Institute of
 
Genetic Medicine at Johns
 
Hopkins
 
University, and
 
Editor, Genome Research
 
 
Dr. Barbara Cohen
 
Senior Editor
 
Public Library of Science
 
 
Dr. Tony Delamothe
 
BMJ Publishing Group
 
United Kingdom
 
 
Dr. Michael Eisen
 
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
 
University of California Berkeley,
 
and
 
Public Library of Science
 
 
Dr. Les Grivell
 
Programme Manager
 
European Molecular Biology
 
Organization
 
Germany
 
 
Prof. Jean-Claude Gu�don
 
Professor of Comparative
 
Literature,
 
University of Montreal, and
 
Member of the Information
 
Sub-Board,
 
Open Society Institute
 
 
Dr. R. Scott Hawley
 
Genetics Society of America
 
 
Mr. Richard K. Johnson
 
Enterprise Director
 
SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and
 
Academic
 
Resources Coalition)
 
 
Dr. Marc W. Kirschner
 
Harvard Medical School
 
 
Dr. David Lipman
 
Director, NCBI
 
National Library of Medicine
 
National Institutes of Health
 
 
Mr. Arnold P. Lutzker
 
Lutzker & Lutzker, LLP
 
Outside Counsel for Open Society
 
Institute
 
 
Ms. Elizabeth Marincola
 
Executive Director
 
The American Society for Cell
 
Biology
 
 
Dr. Richard J. Roberts
 
New England Biolabs
 
 
Dr. Gerald M. Rubin
 
Vice President and Director,
 
Janelia Farm
 
Research Campus
 
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
 
 
Prof. Robert Schloegl
 
Chair, Task Force on Electronic
 
Publishing
 
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft,
 
Germany
 
 
Dr. Vivian Siegel
 
Executive Editor
 
Public Library of Science
 
 
Dr. Anthony D. So
 
Health Equity Division
 
The Rockefeller Foundation
 
 
Dr. Peter Suber
 
Professor of Philosophy, Earlham
 
College
 
Open Access Project Director,
 
Public Knowledge
 
Senior Researcher, SPARC
 
 
Dr. Harold E. Varmus
 
President, Memorial Sloan-
 
Kettering Cancer Center
 
Chair, Board of Directors, Public
 
Library of Science
 
 
Mr. Jan Velterop
 
Publisher
 
BioMed Central
 
United Kingdom
 
 
Dr. Mark J. Walport
 
Director Designate
 
The Wellcome Trust
 
United Kingdom
 
 
Ms. Linda Watson
 
Director
 
Claude Moore Health Sciences
 
Library
 
University of Virginia Health
 
System
 
 
== <small>'''File'''</small> ==
 
[[File:Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.pdf|thumbnail]]
 
 
== <small>'''Links'''</small> ==
 
 
'''URL:''' http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
 
 
'''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20160626014401/http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
 
 
'''Wikipedia:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Statement_on_Open_Access_Publishing
 
 
[[Category:Manifestos]]
 
[[Category:English]]
 
[[Category:Belarusian]]
 
[[Category:Bulgarian]]
 
[[Category:Catalan]]
 
[[Category:Chinese]]
 
[[Category:Czech]]
 
[[Category:Danish]]
 
[[Category:French]]
 
[[Category:German]]
 
[[Category:Hungarian]]
 
[[Category:Italian]]
 
[[Category:Korean]]
 
[[Category:Lithuanian]]
 
[[Category:Macedonian]]
 
[[Category:Polish]]
 
[[Category:Portuguese]]
 
[[Category:Romanian]]
 
[[Category:Russian]]
 
[[Category:Slovene]]
 
[[Category:Spanish]]
 
[[Category:Swedish]]
 
[[Category:Ukrainian]]
 
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:2003]]
 
[[Category:Patrick O. Brown]]
 
[[Category:Diane Cabell]]
 
[[Category:Aravinda Chakravarti]]
 
[[Category:Barbara Cohen]]
 
[[Category:Tony Delamothe]]
 
[[Category:Michael Eisen]]
 
[[Category:Les Grivell]]
 
[[Category:Jean-Claude Guédon]]
 
[[Category:R. Scott Hawley]]
 
[[Category:Richard K. Johnson]]
 
[[Category:Marc W. Kirschner]]
 
[[Category:David Lipman]]
 
[[Category:Arnold P. Lutzker]]
 
[[Category:Elizabeth Marincola]]
 
[[Category:Richard J. Roberts]]
 
[[Category:Gerald M. Rubin]]
 
[[Category:Robert Schloegl]]
 
[[Category:Vivian Siegel]]
 
[[Category:Anthony D. So]]
 
[[Category:Peter Suber]]
 
[[Category:Harold E. Varmus]]
 
[[Category:Jan Velterop]]
 
[[Category:Mark J. Walport]]
 
[[Category:Linda Watson]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:54, 28 December 2020