Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia Research Initiative (2010) Wikipedia Critical Point of View Conference Report"

From Domains, Publics and Access
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Critical Point of View (2010).''Critical Point of View conference report.''Amsterdam:Institute of Network Cultures'''
 
 
 
Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#
 
Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#
  

Revision as of 02:38, 2 April 2016

Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#

Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#

Resumen:It would be no exaggeration to state that Wikipedia is at the brink of becoming the de facto global reference of dynamic knowledge. The highly visible clashes amongst opinion leaders, university professors, Web 2.0 ‘evangelists’ and publishers over accuracy, anonymity, trust, vandalism and expertise only seem to fuel further growth of Wikipedia and its user base. In this respect, what does it mean to now say that Wikipedia has become “mainstream”?

This one and many more questions were asked on the Critical Point of View conference, held March 2010 in Amsterdam. The Critical Point of View conference report functions both as a summary and as archive of the project. It consists of the key results, the conference program, all conference blogposts and many other (research) blogposts concerning the topic of Wikipedia research and critique

Categoría:Biblioteca Categoría:Institute of Network Cultures Categoría:Critical Point of View Categoría:Inglés Categoría:Holanda Categoría:2010