Difference between revisions of "Nicolás Mendoza (2015) Liquid Separation: Three Fundamental Dimensions within LiquidFeedback and other Voting Technologies"
(Página creada con «URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408 Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408...») |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | [[File: Jedem_compact.jpg | thumbnail | right]] | |
− | + | == <small>'''Abstract'''</small> == | |
+ | The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity. | ||
− | + | == <small>'''Keywords'''</small> == | |
− | + | digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback. | |
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''File'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: Liquid Separation.pdf]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Source'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/index JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Links'''</small> == | ||
− | + | '''URL:''' http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408 | |
− | + | '''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408 | |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:Library]] |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:English]] |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:Austria]] |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:2015]] |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:Nicolás Mendoza]] |
− | [[ | + | [[Category:eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government]] |
Latest revision as of 03:14, 30 April 2017
Contents
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.
Keywords
digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback.
File
Source
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Links
URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408