2015 – We Lost – F.A.T. Lab - Historial de revisiones

Paz: /* Contexto */

2022-04-06T22:50:27Z

Contexto

Paz: /* Texto */

2019-05-24T12:29:03Z

Texto

Paz: /* Texto */

2019-05-24T12:26:02Z

Texto

Alan Vázquez en 23:49 23 mar 2018

2018-03-23T23:49:27Z

Alan Vázquez en 22:41 23 mar 2018

2018-03-23T22:41:04Z

Paz: /* Autoras */

2018-03-23T20:31:49Z

Autoras

Alan Vázquez en 18:29 20 mar 2018

2018-03-20T18:29:01Z

Alan Vázquez: Alan Vázquez trasladó la página 2015 – We Lost – F.A.T. a 2015 – We Lost – F.A.T. Lab

2018-03-20T18:28:31Z

Alan Vázquez trasladó la página 2015 – We Lost – F.A.T. a 2015 – We Lost – F.A.T. Lab

Alan Vázquez en 18:27 20 mar 2018

2018-03-20T18:27:45Z

Alan Vázquez en 18:10 20 mar 2018

2018-03-20T18:10:30Z

@@ Línea 25: / Línea 25: @@
 El manifiesto, publicado el 1 de agosto de 2015 en un formato audiovisual en el sitio web de Free Art and Technology Lab (F.A.T.), constituye la despedida del colectivo (1).
 Con este texto se anuncia la disolución del grupo mediante un enlace a otra entrada en la que se advierte que la página web, aunque seguirá disponible, funcionará como archivo del trabajo realizado durante los 8 años de vida del F.A.T. Lab (2).
 == <small>'''Autoras'''</small> ==

@@ Línea 17: / Línea 17: @@
 The context of the talk from Chaos Communication Congress of how we lost the war came out of the last great battles for privacy and against biometric identification in a Germany with the cold war still fresh in memory and from the fight against surveillance in a terrorism-frightened Netherlands. In the talk they project forward ten years to 2015. Technological limits for data retention that existed in 2005 are done away with and technical capacities for surveillance are infinite. Yet they also postpone the hope of a new resistance ten years into the future. Maybe in 2015 people have had enough and ten years of capacity building for technological resistance can change society. It is these promises of a large "prosecution of the criminals of the security industry in 2015" that sound the most depressing today. Ten years later we catch up with those predictions in Peter's talk that comes a few months after he came out of prison and his exhaustion from ten years of activism against copyright laws, trade agreements and in the backwaters of massive leaks of information about surveillance that led to absolutely nothing.
-It would be unwise to predict ten years into the future again. But one thing is clear, tactics of the last 5 years whether legal, political, activist or artistic have resulted in little progress and have not kept up with the latest control measures. There's no use banging our heads against the wall anymore. Either your head will explode or they will simply open the door and let you in. Either way, no house will come crumbling down. It was as true in 2005 as when Peter says it in 2015. Let's face it, we lost, we all lost. "We Lost", from F.A.T. GOLD: San Francisco.
+It would be unwise to predict ten years into the future again. But one thing is clear, tactics of the last 5 years whether legal, political, activist or artistic have resulted in little progress and have not kept up with the latest control measures. There's no use banging our heads against the wall anymore. Either your head will explode or they will simply open the door and let you in. Either way, no house will come crumbling down. It was as true in 2005 as when Peter says it in 2015. Let's face it, we lost, we all lost.
-By Magnus Eriksson and Evan Roth.
+"We Lost", from F.A.T. GOLD: San Francisco. By Magnus Eriksson and Evan Roth.
 == <small>'''Contexto'''</small> ==

@@ Línea 17: / Línea 17: @@
 The context of the talk from Chaos Communication Congress of how we lost the war came out of the last great battles for privacy and against biometric identification in a Germany with the cold war still fresh in memory and from the fight against surveillance in a terrorism-frightened Netherlands. In the talk they project forward ten years to 2015. Technological limits for data retention that existed in 2005 are done away with and technical capacities for surveillance are infinite. Yet they also postpone the hope of a new resistance ten years into the future. Maybe in 2015 people have had enough and ten years of capacity building for technological resistance can change society. It is these promises of a large "prosecution of the criminals of the security industry in 2015" that sound the most depressing today. Ten years later we catch up with those predictions in Peter's talk that comes a few months after he came out of prison and his exhaustion from ten years of activism against copyright laws, trade agreements and in the backwaters of massive leaks of information about surveillance that led to absolutely nothing.
-It would be unwise to predict ten years into the future again. But one thing is clear, tactics of the last 5 years whether legal, political, activist or artistic have resulted in little progress and have not kept up with the latest control measures. There's no use banging our heads against the wall anymore. Either your head will explode or they will simply open the door and let you in. Either way, no house will come crumbling down. It was as true in 2005 as when Peter says it in 2015. Let's face it, we lost, we all lost.
+It would be unwise to predict ten years into the future again. But one thing is clear, tactics of the last 5 years whether legal, political, activist or artistic have resulted in little progress and have not kept up with the latest control measures. There's no use banging our heads against the wall anymore. Either your head will explode or they will simply open the door and let you in. Either way, no house will come crumbling down. It was as true in 2005 as when Peter says it in 2015. Let's face it, we lost, we all lost. "We Lost", from F.A.T. GOLD: San Francisco.
 "We Lost", from F.A.T. GOLD: San Francisco. By Magnus Eriksson and Evan Roth.
 == <small>'''Contexto'''</small> ==

@@ Línea 43: / Línea 43: @@
 == <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> ==
-Primera edición: http://fffff.at/we-lost/
+'''Primera edición:''' http://fffff.at/we-lost/
-Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20180320181345/http://fffff.at/we-lost/
+'''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20180320181345/http://fffff.at/we-lost/
 [[Categoría:Manifiestos]]

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 22:41 23 mar 2018
Línea 1:		Línea 1:
−	[[Archivo:Screenshot-fffff.at-2018.03.20-11-58-22.png\|miniaturadeimagen\|derecha\|~~http://~~http://fffff.at/~~rip~~/ copia de 20-03-2018]]	+	[[Archivo:Screenshot-fffff.at-2018.03.23-11-58-22.png\|miniaturadeimagen\|derecha\|http://fffff.at/we-lost/ copia de 23-03-2018]]

	== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==		== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==

@@ Línea 28: / Línea 28: @@
 == <small>'''Autoras'''</small> ==
-F.A.T. Lab fue fundado en el 2007 por Evan Roth y James Powderly. Hasta el 2015 el colectivo se integró por una red de artistas, ingenieros, científicos, abogados y músicos procedentes de distintos países (3).
+F.A.T. Lab fue fundado en el 2007 por Evan Roth y James Powderly. Hasta el 2015 el colectivo se integró por una red de artistas, ingenieros, científicos, abogados y músicos procedentes de distintos países (3). Se definieron a sí mismos como una “organización dedicada a enriquecer el dominio público a través de la investigación y el desarrollo de tecnologías y medios de comunicación creativos” (4). F.A.T. Lab fue conocido por producir trabajos artísticos y políticos que reflexionaban sobre la propiedad intelectual, algunos de ellos destinados al dominio público y otros lanzados bajo diferentes licencias abiertas (4).
 == <small>'''Archivo'''</small> ==

@@ Línea 52: / Línea 52: @@
 [[Categoría:Manifiestos]]
-[[Categoría:F.A.T.]]
+[[Categoría:F.A.T. Lab]]
 [[Categoría:Inglés]]
 [[Categoría:2015]]

← Revisión anterior	Revisión del 18:28 20 mar 2018
(Sin diferencias)

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 18:10 20 mar 2018
Línea 1:		Línea 1:
		+	[[Archivo:Screenshot-fffff.at-2018.03.20-11-58-22.png\|miniaturadeimagen\|derecha\|http://http://fffff.at/rip/ copia de 20-03-2018]]
		+
	== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==		== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==