Diferencia entre revisiones de «2011-2016 - Manifesto for Teaching Online - VVAA»

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Línea 1: Línea 1:
 
== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==
 
== <small>'''Texto'''</small> ==
  
* Online can be the privileged mode. Distance is a positive principle, not a deficit.* Place is differently, not less, important online.* Text has been troubled: many modes matter in representing academic knowledge. * We should attend at the materialities of digital education. The social isn't the whole story.* Opennes is neither neutral nor natural: it creates and depends on closures.* Can we stop talking about digital native?. * Digital education reshapes its subjects. The possibility of the 'online version' is overstated.* There are many ways to get it right online. 'Best practice' neglects context. * Distance is temporal, affective, political: not simply spatial. * Aesthetics matter: interface design shapes learning. * Massiveness is more than learning at scale: it also brings complexity and diversity.Online teaching need not be complicit with the instrumentalisation of education. * A digital assignment can live on. It can be iterative, public, risky and multi-voiced. * Remixing digital content redefines authorship. * Contact works in multiple ways. Face-time is over-valued. * Online teaching should not be drowngraded into 'facilitation'. * Assessment is an act of interpretation, not just measurement. * Algorithms and analytics re-code education: pay attention!. * A routine of plagiarism detection structures-in distrust. * Online courses are prone to cultures of surveillance. Visibility is a pedagogical and ethical issue. * Automation need not impoverish education: we welcome our new robot colleagues. * Don't succumb to campus envy: we are the campus. (versión de 2016)
+
* Online can be the privileged mode. Distance is a positive principle, not a deficit.* Place is differently, not less, important online.* Text has been troubled: many modes matter in representing academic knowledge. * We should attend at the materialities of digital education. The social isn't the whole story.* Opennes is neither neutral nor natural: it creates and depends on closures.* Can we stop talking about digital native?. * Digital education reshapes its subjects. The possibility of the 'online version' is overstated.* There are many ways to get it right online. 'Best practice' neglects context. * Distance is temporal, affective, political: not simply spatial. * Aesthetics matter: interface design shapes learning. * Massiveness is more than learning at scale: it also brings complexity and diversity.Online teaching need not be complicit with the instrumentalisation of education. * A digital assignment can live on. It can be iterative, public, risky and multi-voiced. * Remixing digital content redefines authorship. * Contact works in multiple ways. Face-time is over-valued. * Online teaching should not be drowngraded into 'facilitation'. * Assessment is an act of interpretation, not just measurement. * Algorithms and analytics re-code education: pay attention!. * A routine of plagiarism detection structures-in distrust. * Online courses are prone to cultures of surveillance. Visibility is a pedagogical and ethical issue. * Automation need not impoverish education: we welcome our new robot colleagues. * Don't succumb to campus envy: we are the campus.  
 +
 
 +
* Written by teachers and researches in digital education. University of Edimburgh.
 +
 
 +
(versión de 2016)
  
 
== <small>'''Video'''</small> ==
 
== <small>'''Video'''</small> ==

Revisión del 20:28 26 may 2022

Texto

  • Online can be the privileged mode. Distance is a positive principle, not a deficit.* Place is differently, not less, important online.* Text has been troubled: many modes matter in representing academic knowledge. * We should attend at the materialities of digital education. The social isn't the whole story.* Opennes is neither neutral nor natural: it creates and depends on closures.* Can we stop talking about digital native?. * Digital education reshapes its subjects. The possibility of the 'online version' is overstated.* There are many ways to get it right online. 'Best practice' neglects context. * Distance is temporal, affective, political: not simply spatial. * Aesthetics matter: interface design shapes learning. * Massiveness is more than learning at scale: it also brings complexity and diversity.Online teaching need not be complicit with the instrumentalisation of education. * A digital assignment can live on. It can be iterative, public, risky and multi-voiced. * Remixing digital content redefines authorship. * Contact works in multiple ways. Face-time is over-valued. * Online teaching should not be drowngraded into 'facilitation'. * Assessment is an act of interpretation, not just measurement. * Algorithms and analytics re-code education: pay attention!. * A routine of plagiarism detection structures-in distrust. * Online courses are prone to cultures of surveillance. Visibility is a pedagogical and ethical issue. * Automation need not impoverish education: we welcome our new robot colleagues. * Don't succumb to campus envy: we are the campus.
  • Written by teachers and researches in digital education. University of Edimburgh.

(versión de 2016)

Video

https://vimeo.com/35205074

Contexto

Aparece en https://www.digitalmanifesto.net/manifestos/58/

The manifesto is a series of brief statements that attempt to capture what is generative and productive about online teaching, course design, writing, assessment and community. It is, and may remain, a living document that is reviewed and reworked periodically with colleagues, students and amongst the programme team of the MSc in E-learning at the University of Edinburgh. Its primary purpose is to spark discussion, and to articulate a position about e-learning that informs the work of the project team, and the MSc in E-learning programme more broadly. More at onlineteachingmanifesto.wordpress.com/

This video was created by James Lamb, one of the MSc in E-learning participants.

https://vimeo.com/35205074

Autoras

Fuentes

Enlaces

URL: https://vimeo.com/35205074

Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20160215231013/http://vimeo.com/35205074