Diferencia entre revisiones de «Wikipedia Research Initiative (2010) Wikipedia Critical Point of View Conference Report»
(Página creada con «'''Critical Point of View (2010).''Critical Point of View conference report.''Amsterdam:Institute of Network Cultures''' Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication...») |
|||
| (No se muestran 10 ediciones intermedias de 3 usuarios) | |||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Archivo:critical-point-of-view-img.jpg | miniaturadeimagen | derecha]] | |
| − | + | == <small>'''Resumen'''</small> == | |
| − | + | It would be no exaggeration to state that Wikipedia is at the brink of becoming the de facto global reference of dynamic knowledge. The highly visible clashes amongst opinion leaders, university professors, Web 2.0 ‘evangelists’ and publishers over accuracy, anonymity, trust, vandalism and expertise only seem to fuel further growth of Wikipedia and its user base. In this respect, what does it mean to now say that Wikipedia has become “mainstream”? | |
| − | This one and many more questions were asked on the Critical Point of View conference, held March 2010 in Amsterdam. The Critical Point of View conference report functions both as a summary and as archive of the project. It consists of the key results, the conference program, all conference blogposts and many other (research) blogposts concerning the topic of Wikipedia research and critique | + | This one and many more questions were asked on the Critical Point of View conference, held March 2010 in Amsterdam. The Critical Point of View conference report functions both as a summary and as archive of the project. It consists of the key results, the conference program, all conference blogposts and many other (research) blogposts concerning the topic of Wikipedia research and critique. |
| + | |||
| + | == <small>'''Archivo'''</small> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Archivo: critical-point-of-view.pdf]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == <small>'''Fuentes'''</small> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Institute_of_Network_Cultures| Institute of Network Cultures]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''URL:''' http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/# | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/# | ||
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]] | [[Categoría:Biblioteca]] | ||
| + | [[Categoría:Comunes digitales]] | ||
[[Categoría:Institute of Network Cultures]] | [[Categoría:Institute of Network Cultures]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Categoría:Inglés]] | [[Categoría:Inglés]] | ||
| + | [[Categoría:Holandés]] | ||
[[Categoría:Holanda]] | [[Categoría:Holanda]] | ||
[[Categoría:2010]] | [[Categoría:2010]] | ||
Revisión actual del 19:29 5 dic 2021
Resumen
It would be no exaggeration to state that Wikipedia is at the brink of becoming the de facto global reference of dynamic knowledge. The highly visible clashes amongst opinion leaders, university professors, Web 2.0 ‘evangelists’ and publishers over accuracy, anonymity, trust, vandalism and expertise only seem to fuel further growth of Wikipedia and its user base. In this respect, what does it mean to now say that Wikipedia has become “mainstream”?
This one and many more questions were asked on the Critical Point of View conference, held March 2010 in Amsterdam. The Critical Point of View conference report functions both as a summary and as archive of the project. It consists of the key results, the conference program, all conference blogposts and many other (research) blogposts concerning the topic of Wikipedia research and critique.
Archivo
Archivo:Critical-point-of-view.pdf
Fuentes
Enlaces
URL: http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/critical-point-of-view-conference-report/#