Seminario Diplomado UNAM 2017

Presentación

Diplomado: “Arte, ciencia y filosofía. Medios y mediaciones” de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Responsable: Dra. María Antonia González Valerio

Web:https://www.artemasciencia.org/

Seminario "Poéticas del acceso a la ciencia y la tecnología"

Primera sesión miércoles 18 de octubre de 16:30 a 20:30 hrs. en el edificio de Educación Continua. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.

Segunda sesión jueves 19 de octubre de 17:00 a 20:00 hrs en el Ágora del Museo Universitario de Arte Contemporáneo.

Primera sesión - Arqueología del acceso

Resumen

Domains, Publics and Access is an ongoing collection online of projects related to current access forms such as: open government, open design, citizen science, collaborative economy, commons, co-ops, crowdfunding, DIY, free culture, community currencies, p2p, piracy, etc. The main goal is to preserve initiatives that appear and disappear in different countries because each project is the declaration of a possible future. That’s why the project as the poetics of social forms is studied by an access archaeology that explores the hypothesis of the emergence of new bottom-up institutions. The hypothesis is latent in the work of several authors, but Geert Lovink and Ned Rossiter pose it explicitly around the online organized networks. They provide the theoretical framework for the qualitative textual analysis of the accountability, sustainability and scalability of different projects. The faceted classification adapted to a MediaWiki articulates the field work as a distributed analysis process, and shows how not only organized networks but also top-down networked organizations define the poetics of access forms. The result is an online common-pool resource that displays the historic and antagonistic limits of access and that can be used to develop new research questions –in and out of academia- through the integration of new facets and projects in a simple way.

Bibliografía

Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (Eds.) (2000). Qualitative Resear ching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage.

Bauwens, M. (2006). The Political Economy of Peer Production. CTheory, October, 2. Retrieved from http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499

Bauwens, M. (2007). The Peer to Peer Manifesto: The Emergence of P2P Civilization and Political Economy. Retrieved from http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2007/11/03/the_peer_to_peer_manifesto.htm

Bauwens, M., Ramos, J. & Vasilis, K. (2016). P2P and Planetary Futures. In R. Carslon (Ed.). Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures (193-214). Berlin: Springer.

Bostman, R. & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine Is Yours. How Collaborative Consumption is Changing The Way We Live. New York: Harper-Collins.

Bratton, B.H. (2016). The Stack. On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century: The structure of everyday life (Vol. 1). University of California Press.

Braudel, F. (1982a). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century: The wheels of commerce. University of California Press.

Braudel, F. (1982b). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century: The perspective of the world (Vol. 3). University of California Press.

Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Cohen Salama, M. (1992). Tumbas anónimas. Informe sobre la identificación de restos de víctimas de la represión ilegal. Buenos Aires: Catálogos Editora.

Denton, W (2009, March 28). How to Make a Faceted Classification and Put It On the Web. Retrieved from https://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html

Denton, W. (2003, October). Putting Facets on the Web: An Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved from https://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-biblio.html

Domas White, M. & Marsh, E.E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55, 1, 22-45.

Ernst, W. (2013). Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Galloway, A. (2004). Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Galloway, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. University of Minnesota Press.

Galloway, A. (2012). The Interface Effect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Books.

García Canclini, N. (2006). Diferentes, desiguales y desconectados. Mapas de la interculturalidad. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Gil, J. & Schmidt, S. (2002). Análisis de redes. Aplicaciones en ciencias sociales. IIMAS-UNAM: México.

González Ruibal, A. (2012). Hacia otra arqueología: diez propuestas. Compliutum, 23, 2, 103-116.

Groys, B. (2010). Going Public. Berlin: Sternberg Press.

Harris, M. (1980). Chapter Two: The Epistemology of Cultural Materialism. In M. Harris, Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture (pp. 29-45). New York: Random House.

Harrison, R. (2011). Surface Assemblage. Towards and Archaeology In and Of The Present. Archaeological Dialogues, 18, 141-161.

Harrison, R., Graves-Brown, P. & Piccini, A. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World. Oxford University Press.

Hayden, C. (2010). Lo procomún y el campo farmaceútico. En C. López Beltrán (coord.), El retorno de los comunes (117-133). México: Fractal (57).

Hayden, C. (2011). No patent, no generic: Pharmaceutical Access and the Politics of the Copy. In Biagioli, Jaszi & Woodmansee (Eds.), Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective (285-304). University of Chicago Press.

Herring, S. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme For Computer-Mediated Discourse. Language@internet, 4. Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761

Herring, S., Stein, D. & Virtanen, T. (2013). Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: Gruyter Mouton.

Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London & New York: Verso.

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.

Jameson, F. (2002). A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London & New York Verso.

Kleiner, D. (2010). The Telekommunist Manifesto. Amsterdam: Network Notebooks 03, Institute of Network Cultures. Retrieved from http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/no-03-the-telekommunist-manifesto-dmytri-kleiner/#

Kwasnick, B. H. 1999. The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48, 1, 22-47.

Lafuente, A., Alonso, A. & Rodríguez, J. (2013). ¡Todos sabios! Ciencia ciudadana y conocimiento expandido. Madrid: Cátedra.

Lomnitz, L. A. (1977). Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown. New York: Academic Press.

Lovink, G. & Rossiter, N. (2005). Dawn of the Organised Networks. The Fibreculture Journal 05. Retrieved from http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-029-dawn-of-the-organised-networks/print/

Lovink, G. & Rossiter, N. (2010). Urgent Aphorisms: Notes on Organized Networks for the Connected Multitudes. Retrieved from http://networkcultures.org/geert/urgent-aphorisms-notes-on-organized-networks-for-the-connected-multitudes/

Lovink, G. & Rossiter, N. (2013, November 28). Organised Networks: Weak Ties to Strong Links. Retrieved from http://nedrossiter.org/?p=371

Lovink, G. & Rossiter, N. (2015, January 5). Organized Networks: A Guide for the Distracted Multitudes. Retrieved from http://nedrossiter.org/?p=448

Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. Public Affairs

Mouffe, Ch. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking The World Politically. London, New York: Verso.

O’Reilly, T. (2013). Open Data and Algorithmic Regulation. In B. Goldstein & L. Dyson (Eds.), Beyond Transparency. Open Data and The Future of Civic Innovation (289-301). San Francisco, CA: Code for America Press. Retrieved from http://beyondtransparency.org/pdf/BeyondTransparency.pdf

O’Reilly, T. (2010). Government As a Platform. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (Eds.), Open Government. O’Reilly Media Inc. Retrieved from http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1234000000774/ch02.html#lesson_1_open_standards_spark_innovation

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Parikka, J. (2012). What is Media Archaeology?. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Radical Software (eds.). (1970). Presentation [Electronic version]. Radical Software, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.radicalsoftware.org/volume1nr1/pdf/VOLUME1NR1_0002.pdf

Raley, R. (2009). Tactical Media. Minnesota University Press.

Rathje, W. & Murphy, C. (2001). Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage. The University of Arizona Press.

Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Rodriguez-Castro, B., Glaser, H. & Carr, L. (2010). How to Reuse a Faceted Classification and Put it on the Semantic Web. In, The 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Shanghai, China. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/271488/5/rodriguez-castro-iswc2010-submission253-rev325.pdf

Rossiter, N. (2006). Organized Networks. Media Theory, Creative Labour, New Institutions. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.

Sastre, P. & Lafuente, A. (2013, January). Archaeologies of the present, museum for the future: thinking the relation between heritage and commons. Presented in 7th World Archaeological Congress, Dead Sea, Jordan. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7266063/_2013_Archaeologies_of_the_present_museum_for_the_future_thinking_the_relation_between_heritage_and_commons

Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism. Challenging The Corporate Sharing Economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. Retrieved from http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/wp-content/files_mf/scholz_platformcoop_5.9.2016.pdf

Scholz, T. & Schneider, N. (2016). Ours to Hack and to Own: Platform Cooperativism. A New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet. OR Books.

Scholz, T. & Lovink, G. (2007). The Art of Free Cooperation. New York. Autonomedia.

Segunda sesión - Poéticas de las formas sociales

Resumen

Se analiza la figura del prosumidor desde los estudios visuales a partir de la combinación de la teoría de los actos de habla y los nuevos medios. El objetivo es evaluar si la distinción entre productores y consumidores, estrategias y tácticas de Michel de Certeau continúa siendo operativa en las interfaces gráficas de la cultura global de la información de Scott Lash. Para ello distingue dos tipos de performatividad de los actos de habla: la performatividadtop-down delsoftware, y labottom-up de los juegos del lenguaje y las formas de vida. Estos tipos se aplican al análisis del discurso de los eslóganes que aparecen en los sitios web de las iniciativas “open” y de economía colaborativa, ya que las primeras están dedicadas a la producción de bienes inmateriales y las segundas a la producción de bienes materiales. El desarrollo muestra cómo los dos tipos de performatividad transforman el análisis textual de los estudios literarios y cinematográficos en una metodología capaz de investigar acciones materiales, humanas y no humanas. Las conclusiones describen el surgimiento de nuevas convenciones narrativas de poder y control ajenas a la ficción que apuntan a una “DIY society”.

Bibliografía

AGRE, P. (2003). Surveillance and Capture. En N. Wardrip-Fruin & N. Montfort (Eds.),The New Media Reader. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

ANDERSON, B. (1991).Imagined Communities. Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.

ARNS, I. (2005). Code as performative speech act. Artnode. Obtenido de: http://www.uoc.edu/artnodes/espai/eng/art/arns0505.pdf

AUSTIN, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

BAUWENS, M. (2006). The Political Economy of Peer Production.CTheory, October 2. Obtenido de: <http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499>

BOSTMAN, R. & Rogers, R. (2010).What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper-Collins.

CRAMER, F., GABRIEL U. (2001). Software Art. Netzliteratur. Obtenido de: <http://www.netzliteratur.net/cramer/software_art_-_transmediale.html>

CRAMER, F. (2006).Entering the Machine and Leaving It Again: Poetics of Software in Contemporary Art. Obtenido de: <http://www.gwei.org/pages/press/press/Florian_Cramer/fullversion.html>

DE CERTEAU, M. (1988).The Practice of the Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

DE LOMNITZ, L. (1975). Cómo sobreviven los marginados. México: Siglo XXI.

DIETRICH, F. (1986). The First Decade of Computer Art (1965-1975). Leonardo, 19-2, 159-169.

GALLOWAY, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays On Algorithmic Culture. University of Minnesota Press.

GARCÍA CANCLINI, N. (2006). Desórdenes: chatarra e informalidad. En J. L. Pérez Pont (ed.), Geografías del desorden. Migración, alteridad y nueva esfera social. Valencia: Universitat de València.

GIACCARDI, E. (2005). Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture. Leonardo, 38- 4, 342–349.

GIANETTI, C. (2004). Aesthetics of the Digital. Media Art Net. Obtenido de: <http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/themes/aesthetics_of_the_digital/editorial/>

GOETZ, T. (2003). Open source everywhere. Wired. Obtenido de: <http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.11/opensource.html>

GOLUMBIA, D. (2009).The Cultural Logic of Computation. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

HERRING, S. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4. Obtenido de: <http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761>

HERRING, S. (2010). Web content analysis: expanding the paradigm. En Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M., (eds.) International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer.

HERRING, S. C.,STEIN, D.,VIRTANEN, T. (eds.) (2013).Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: Mouton.

ILICH, F. (2011).Otra narrativa es posible. Imaginación política en la era de Internet. Córdoba: Ediciones Recovecos.

JAMESON, F. (2007). Signatures of the visible. New York and London: Routledge,

KELLY, K. (2009). Better Than Owning. The Technium. Obtenido de: http://kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/01/better_than_own.php

KOTLER, P (1986). Prosumers: A New Type of Customer.The Futurist, September–October, 24-28.

LASH, S. (2002). Critique of Information. London: SAGE Publications.

LATITUDE (n.d.). The New Sharing Economy. Latitude. Obtenido de: <http://latdsurvey.net/pdf/Sharing.pdf>

LAUREL, B. (1993). Computers as Theatre. Boston: Addison-Wensley.

LOVINK, G. (2011).My First Recession. Critical Internet Culture in Transition. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

LOVINK, G.,ROSSITER, N. (2005). Dawn of the Organised Networks.Fiberculture, 5. Obtenido de: <http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-029-dawn-of-the-organised-networks/>

LYOTARD, J.F. (1987). La condición postmoderna. Informe sobre el saber. Madrid: Cátedra.

MANOVICH, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

MANOVICH, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. New York, London: Bloomsbury.

MANOVICH, L. (2015). The Science of Culture? Social Computing, Digital Humanities, and Cultural Analytics. Obtenido de: <http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/cultural-analytics-social-computing>

MARSHALL, J. (1999). Performativity: Lyotard and Foucault Through Searle and Austin.Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18-5, 309-317.

MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. (1991).De los medios a las mediaciones. Comunicación, cultura y hegemonía. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

METAHAVEN (2013). Captives of the Cloud Part I, Part II, Part III. Eflux. Obtenido de: <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/captives-of-the-cloud-part-i/> <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/captives-of-the-cloud-part-ii/> <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/captives-of-the-cloud-part-iii-all-tomorrows-clouds/>

MOLES, A. A. (1973). Théorie de l'information et perception esthétique. Paris: Denoël.

MOORE, P. (2011). Subjectivity in the Ecologies of Peer to Peer Production.Fiberculture. Obtenido de: <http://seventeen.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-119-peer-to-peer-production-a-revolutionary-or-neoliberal-mode-of-subjectivation/>

MOULAERT, F.,MACCALLUM, D.,MEHMOOD, A.,HAMDOUCH, A. (2013).The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

MURRAY, J. (1999).Hamlet en la holocubierta. El futuro de la narrativa en el ciberespacio. Barcelona: Paidós.

NOLL, M. (1967). The digital computer as a creative medium. IEEE spectrum, October.

NORDENSTRENG, K. &VARIS, T. (1974). Television Traffic, a One-Way Street? A Survey and Analysis of the International Flow of Television Programme Material.Reports and Papers on Mass Communication 70, UNESCO.

RHEINGOLD, H. (2002).Multitudes inteligentes. La próxima revolución social. Barcelona: Gedisa.

ROSSITER N. (2004). Creative Industries, Comparative Media Theory and the Limits of Critique from Within. Topia Journal 11, Spring. Obtenido de: <http://topia.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/topia/article/view/2666>

STRIPHAS, T. (2015). Algorithmic Culture.European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 395–412.

TOFFLER, A. (1980). La tercera ola. Bogotá: Plaza & Janés.

WEIBEL, P. (1984). On the History and Aesthetics of the Digital Image.Ars Electronica Archive. Obtenido de: <http://90.146.8.18/en/archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=9369>

WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1986). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1922).Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Obtenido de: <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5740/5740-pdf.pdf>

YOUNGBLOOD, G. (1983). Computer art as a way of life. Send (Fall). Obtenido de: <http://www.vasulka.org/archive/4-30b/Seno%289015%29.pdf>

YOUNGBLOOD, G. (1986). Metadesign: Towards a Postmodernism of Reconstruction.Ars Electronica Archive. Obtenido de: <http://90.146.8.18/en/archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=9210>