Diferencia entre revisiones de «Categoría:Publicaciones»

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Línea 4: Línea 4:
 
[[Archivo:2017 Domains Publics and Access. A Wiki.pdf|miniaturadeimagen|izquierda]]
 
[[Archivo:2017 Domains Publics and Access. A Wiki.pdf|miniaturadeimagen|izquierda]]
 
   
 
   
 
 
Domains, Publics and Access is an ongoing collection online of projects related to current access forms such as: open government, open design, citizen science, collaborative economy, commons, coops , crowdfunding, DIY, free culture, community currencies, p2p, piracy, etc. The main goal is to preserve initiatives that appear and disappear in different countries because each project is the declaration of a possible future. That's why the project as the poetics of social forms is studied by an access archaeology that explores the hypothesis of the emergence of new bottom-up institutions. The hypothesis is latent in the work of several authors, but Geert Lovink and Ned Ros-siter pose it explicitly around the online organized networks. They provide the theoretical framework for the qualitative textual analysis of the accountability, sustainability and scalability of different projects. The faceted classification adapted to a MediaWiki articulates the field work as a distributed analysis process, and shows how not only organized networks but also top-down networked organizations define the poetics of access forms. The result is an online common-pool resource that displays the historic and antagonistic limits of access and that can be used to develop new research questions –in and out of academia-through the integration of new facets and projects in a simple way. Keywords Archaeology of the present, media archaeology, bottom-up institutions , poetics of social forms.
 
Domains, Publics and Access is an ongoing collection online of projects related to current access forms such as: open government, open design, citizen science, collaborative economy, commons, coops , crowdfunding, DIY, free culture, community currencies, p2p, piracy, etc. The main goal is to preserve initiatives that appear and disappear in different countries because each project is the declaration of a possible future. That's why the project as the poetics of social forms is studied by an access archaeology that explores the hypothesis of the emergence of new bottom-up institutions. The hypothesis is latent in the work of several authors, but Geert Lovink and Ned Ros-siter pose it explicitly around the online organized networks. They provide the theoretical framework for the qualitative textual analysis of the accountability, sustainability and scalability of different projects. The faceted classification adapted to a MediaWiki articulates the field work as a distributed analysis process, and shows how not only organized networks but also top-down networked organizations define the poetics of access forms. The result is an online common-pool resource that displays the historic and antagonistic limits of access and that can be used to develop new research questions –in and out of academia-through the integration of new facets and projects in a simple way. Keywords Archaeology of the present, media archaeology, bottom-up institutions , poetics of social forms.

Revisión del 21:03 6 jul 2018

Sastre, P. (2017). Domains, Publics and Access. A Wiki In Progress On Access Archaeology. ISEA 2017 Bio-Creation and Peace Proceedings.

Archivo:2017 Domains Publics and Access. A Wiki.pdf

Domains, Publics and Access is an ongoing collection online of projects related to current access forms such as: open government, open design, citizen science, collaborative economy, commons, coops , crowdfunding, DIY, free culture, community currencies, p2p, piracy, etc. The main goal is to preserve initiatives that appear and disappear in different countries because each project is the declaration of a possible future. That's why the project as the poetics of social forms is studied by an access archaeology that explores the hypothesis of the emergence of new bottom-up institutions. The hypothesis is latent in the work of several authors, but Geert Lovink and Ned Ros-siter pose it explicitly around the online organized networks. They provide the theoretical framework for the qualitative textual analysis of the accountability, sustainability and scalability of different projects. The faceted classification adapted to a MediaWiki articulates the field work as a distributed analysis process, and shows how not only organized networks but also top-down networked organizations define the poetics of access forms. The result is an online common-pool resource that displays the historic and antagonistic limits of access and that can be used to develop new research questions –in and out of academia-through the integration of new facets and projects in a simple way. Keywords Archaeology of the present, media archaeology, bottom-up institutions , poetics of social forms.

Esta categoría no contiene ninguna página o archivo.