Diferencia entre revisiones de «2021 - Manifesto for Digital Social Touch in Crisis - Carey Jewitt, Sara Price, Jürgen Steimle, Gijs Huisman, Lili Golmohammadi, Narges Pourjafa, William Frier, Thomas Howard, Sima Ipakchian Askari, Michela Ornati, Sabrina Panëels & Judith Weda»

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Línea 25: Línea 25:
 
== <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> ==
 
== <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> ==
  
'''URL:''' https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/754050/fcomp-03-754050-HTML-r2/image_m/fcomp-03-754050-g001.jpg
+
'''URL:''' https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full
 
  
'''Wayback Machine:'''http://web.archive.org/web/20220417184520/https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/754050/fcomp-03-754050-HTML-r2/image_m/fcomp-03-754050-g001.jpg
+
'''Wayback Machine:''' http://web.archive.org/web/20220312190653/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full
http://web.archive.org/web/20220312190653/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full
 
  
 
[[Categoría:Manifiestos]]
 
[[Categoría:Manifiestos]]

Revisión del 18:48 17 abr 2022

Texto

This manifesto is for designers and developers working on digital touch across academia and industry. It is a vision designed to challenge and provoke debate, raise awareness, incite questions, inspire and direct research and design on the social and sensory aspects of the digital design of touch.

Human touch is at risk. Of disappearing. Neglected touch. Low touch. No touch. Not enough touch. Touch hunger. Skin starvation. Touch deprivation. Remote. Distant. Missing. ///Flip Switch/// Too much touch. Intrusive. Unwelcome. The wrong kind of touch. Feel the cacophony, the weight of fears for technological touch - but don't forget the good dreams.

1. MAKE SOCIAL TOUCHCENTRAL

Human touch matters! Hone in on social touch. Include 'touch matters at the heart of digital communication. Amidst conflicting social concerns and uncertain futures, we must find routes to navigate the technological realities and promises for social touch. Give life back to the digital: Feel the pulse.

2. DESIGN TOUCH FIRST, TECHNOLOGY SECOND

Touch is at risk in technology. Technology (alone) is no the solution. We need technologies to better realize digital touch. Goals for digital touch should be set by something more than technological availability. Amplify interdisciplinarity to PRESS RESET. Rebalance the dialogue between thw social, sensory, tactile aesthetic and tecnological drivers underpinning digital touch development.Bring nuance to collective imaginary of future touch.

3. DEMOCRATISE TOUCH:DON'T LOCK IT IN

Touch is political. Touch is infused with power. We are positioned to touch through socio-economic and socio-cultural drivers. Let's interrogate how digital design reshapes touch needs and norms. Digital touch needs to be a felt conversation. Everyone is qualified to have a say on what digital touch might be/become. The touch etiquettes of the 20th century will not suffice. OPEN up'opportunity spaces' to AVOID imaginatins of touch getting 'locked in'. DESIRE HETEROGENEITY. Just say no to 'homogenised touching'. Amplify diversity through haptic encodings.

Contexto

Autoras

Fuentes

Enlaces

URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full

Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20220312190653/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2021.754050/full