Diferencia entre revisiones de «Damien MacNamara, Paul Gibson, Ken Oakley (2014) The Ideal Voting Interface: Classifying Usability»
(Página creada con «URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306 Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710192608/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/30...») |
|||
Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
− | + | [[Archivo: jedem_compact.jpg | miniaturadeimagen | derecha]] | |
− | + | == <small>'''Resumen'''</small> == | |
+ | This work presents a feature-oriented taxonomy for commercial electronic voting machines, which focuses on usability aspects. Based on this analysis, we propose a ‘Just-Like-Paper’ (JLP) classification method which identifies five broad categories of eVoting interface. We extend the classification to investigate its application as an indicator of voting efficiency and identify a universal ten-step process encompassing all possible voting steps spanning the twenty-six machines studied. Our analysis concludes that multi-functional and progressive interfaces are likely to be more efficient versus multi-modal voter-activated machines. | ||
− | + | == <small>'''Palabras clave'''</small> == | |
− | + | eVoting; usability; classification;interface; electronic voting machine. | |
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Archivo'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Archivo: the-ideal-voting-interface.pdf ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Fuente'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/index JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> == | ||
− | + | '''URL:''' http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306 | |
− | + | '''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20160710192608/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306 | |
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]] | [[Categoría:Biblioteca]] |
Revisión del 21:55 17 abr 2017
Resumen
This work presents a feature-oriented taxonomy for commercial electronic voting machines, which focuses on usability aspects. Based on this analysis, we propose a ‘Just-Like-Paper’ (JLP) classification method which identifies five broad categories of eVoting interface. We extend the classification to investigate its application as an indicator of voting efficiency and identify a universal ten-step process encompassing all possible voting steps spanning the twenty-six machines studied. Our analysis concludes that multi-functional and progressive interfaces are likely to be more efficient versus multi-modal voter-activated machines.
Palabras clave
eVoting; usability; classification;interface; electronic voting machine.
Archivo
Archivo:The-ideal-voting-interface.pdf
Fuente
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Enlaces
URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710192608/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306