Diferencia entre revisiones de «Damien MacNamara, Paul Gibson, Ken Oakley (2014) The Ideal Voting Interface: Classifying Usability»
Línea 15: | Línea 15: | ||
== <small>'''Fuente'''</small> == | == <small>'''Fuente'''</small> == | ||
− | [ | + | [http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/index JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government] |
== <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> == | == <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> == |
Revisión del 21:57 17 abr 2017
Resumen
This work presents a feature-oriented taxonomy for commercial electronic voting machines, which focuses on usability aspects. Based on this analysis, we propose a ‘Just-Like-Paper’ (JLP) classification method which identifies five broad categories of eVoting interface. We extend the classification to investigate its application as an indicator of voting efficiency and identify a universal ten-step process encompassing all possible voting steps spanning the twenty-six machines studied. Our analysis concludes that multi-functional and progressive interfaces are likely to be more efficient versus multi-modal voter-activated machines.
Palabras clave
eVoting; usability; classification;interface; electronic voting machine.
Archivo
Archivo:The-ideal-voting-interface.pdf
Fuente
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Enlaces
URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710192608/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/306