Diferencia entre revisiones de «Karin Nahon, Alon Peled, Jenniver Shkabatur (2015) OGD Heartbeat: Cities’ Commitment to Open Data»

Revisión actual del 01:26 5 dic 2021

Resumen

This paper develops and tests a theoretical model, which proposes to examine cities’ commitment to the concept of open government data (OGD) according to three typical levels. Level 1, Way of Life, indicates high commitment to OGD; Level 2, On the Fence, represents either a low or erratic commitment; Level 3, Lip Service, refers to either scarce or no commitment. This study shows that these types exhibit distinct behavior in four key indicators: (1) Rhythm, (2) Coverage, (3) Categorization, and (4) Feedback. This theoretical framework is examined using longitudinal mixed-method analysis of the OGD behavior of 16 US cities over a period of four years, using a corpus of municipal quantitative metadata and primary qualitative data. This methodology allows us to represent, for the first time, cities’ evolving OGD commitment, or “OGD heartbeat”.

Palabras clave

open government data, cities, transparency, access, open cities, open data benchmarking.

Archivo

Archivo:OGD-heartbeat.pdf

Fuente

JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government

Enlaces

URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410

Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710163313/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410

@@ Línea 1: / Línea 1: @@
-URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410
+[[File: jedem_compact.jpg| thumbnail | right]]
-Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710163313/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410
+== <small>'''Resumen'''</small> ==
+This paper develops and tests a theoretical model, which proposes to examine cities’ commitment to the concept of open government data (OGD) according to three typical levels. Level 1, Way of Life, indicates high commitment to OGD; Level 2, On the Fence, represents either a low or erratic commitment; Level 3, Lip Service, refers to either scarce or no commitment. This study shows that these types exhibit distinct behavior in four key indicators: (1) Rhythm, (2) Coverage, (3) Categorization, and (4) Feedback. This theoretical framework is examined using longitudinal mixed-method analysis of the OGD behavior of 16 US cities over a period of four years, using a corpus of municipal quantitative metadata and primary qualitative data. This methodology allows us to represent, for the first time, cities’ evolving OGD commitment, or “OGD heartbeat”.
+== <small>'''Palabras clave'''</small> ==
+open government data, cities, transparency, access, open cities, open data benchmarking.
+== <small>'''Archivo'''</small> ==
+[[File: OGD-heartbeat.pdf]]
-Abstract
+== <small>'''Fuente'''</small> ==
-This paper develops and tests a theoretical model, which proposes to examine cities’ commitment to the concept of open government data (OGD) according to three typical levels. Level 1, Way of Life, indicates high commitment to OGD; Level 2, On the Fence, represents either a low or erratic commitment; Level 3, Lip Service, refers to either scarce or no commitment. This study shows that these types exhibit distinct behavior in four key indicators: (1) Rhythm, (2) Coverage, (3) Categorization, and (4) Feedback. This theoretical framework is examined using longitudinal mixed-method analysis of the OGD behavior of 16 US cities over a period of four years, using a corpus of municipal quantitative metadata and primary qualitative data. This methodology allows us to represent, for the first time, cities’ evolving OGD commitment, or “OGD heartbeat”.
+[http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/index JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government]
+== <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> ==
+'''URL:''' http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410
-Keywords
+'''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20160710163313/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/410
-open government data, cities, transparency, access, open cities, open data benchmarking.
 [[Categoría:Biblioteca]]
+[[Categoría:Gobierno abierto]]
+[[Categoría:Datos abiertos]]
 [[Categoría:Inglés]]
 [[Categoría:Austria]]