Diferencia entre revisiones de «Nicolás Mendoza (2015) Liquid Separation: Three Fundamental Dimensions within LiquidFeedback and other Voting Technologies»

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
m (Paz movió la página Nicolas Mendoza (2015) Liquid Separation: Three Fundamental Dimensions within LiquidFeedback and other Voting Technologies a [[Nicolás Mendoza (2015) Liquid Separation: Three Fundamental Dimensions within LiquidFeedback and o...)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
−
URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408
+
[[File: Jedem_compact.jpg | thumbnail | right]]
  
−
Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408
+
== <small>'''Resumen'''</small> ==
  
 +
The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.
  
−
Abstract
+
== <small>'''Palabras clave'''</small> ==
  
−
The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.
+
digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback.
 +
 
 +
== <small>'''Archivo'''</small> ==
 +
 
 +
[[File: Liquid Separation.pdf]]
 +
 
 +
== <small>'''Fuente'''</small> ==
 +
 
 +
[http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/index JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government]
 +
 
 +
== <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> ==
  
−
Keywords
+
'''URL:''' http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408
  
−
digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback.
+
'''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408
  
 
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]]
 
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]]

Revisión del 03:13 30 abr 2017

Jedem compact.jpg

Resumen

The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.

Palabras clave

digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback.

Archivo

Archivo:Liquid Separation.pdf

Fuente

JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government

Enlaces

URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408

Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408

Obtenido de «http://dpya.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nicolás_Mendoza_(2015)_Liquid_Separation:_Three_Fundamental_Dimensions_within_LiquidFeedback_and_other_Voting_Technologies&oldid=120294»