Nicolás Mendoza (2015) Liquid Separation: Three Fundamental Dimensions within LiquidFeedback and other Voting Technologies

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Revisión del 16:17 10 jul 2016 de Paz (discusión | contribs.) (Página creada con «URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408 Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408...»)
(difs.) ← Revisión anterior | Revisión actual (difs.) | Revisión siguiente → (difs.)
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda

URL: http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408

Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/20160710161600/http://www.jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/408


Abstract

The objective of this paper is to capitalize on the experiences of LiquidFeedback, providing insights that can be helpful for future developers of voting technologies. The condition of LiquidFeedback as a digital platform carries dramatic implications in terms of its ability to perceive, secure, and make effective the political expression of the community. Beyond the hype, can the LiquidFeedback platform accurately perceive the political will of participants? As a voting technology, is it socially located in a position from where it can meaningfully change the state of affairs of society? Is it configured so that it guarantees fairness and safety from both public and private perspectives? As a result of the conjunction of interviews and critical analysis, three fundamental dimensions to all voting technologies are proposed: Expressivity, Influence, and Integrity.

Keywords

digital democracy, voting technologies, Pirate Party, Liquid Democracy, LiquidFeedback.

Obtenido de «http://dpya.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nicolás_Mendoza_(2015)_Liquid_Separation:_Three_Fundamental_Dimensions_within_LiquidFeedback_and_other_Voting_Technologies&oldid=6395»