Diferencia entre revisiones de «Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink (eds.) (2000) Tulipomania DotCom Reader»
Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
− | + | [[File: Tulipomania_DotCom_Reader-img.jpg | thumbnail | right]] | |
− | + | == <small>'''Resumen'''</small> == | |
+ | In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Archivo'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File: Tulipomania_DotCom_Reader.pdf]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Fuente'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Institute_of_Network_Cultures|Institute of Network Cultures]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == <small>'''Enlaces'''</small> == | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''URL:''' http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Wayback Machine:''' https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/ | ||
− | |||
[[Categoría:Biblioteca]] | [[Categoría:Biblioteca]] |
Revisión del 18:23 10 may 2017
Resumen
In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement.
Archivo
Archivo:Tulipomania DotCom Reader.pdf
Fuente
Enlaces
URL: http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/