Diferencia entre revisiones de «Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink (eds.) (2000) Tulipomania DotCom Reader»

De Dominios, públicos y acceso
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Línea 1: Línea 1:
'''Ted Byfield, Menno Hurenkamp, Andreas Kallfelz, Eric Kluitenberg, Geert Lovink(2000).''Tulipomania DotCom Reader.''Amsterdam.Institute of Network Cultures.'''
 
 
 
Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
 
Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/
  

Revisión del 20:22 3 abr 2016

Enlace:http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/

Wayback Machine:https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/tulipomania-dotcom-reader/


Resumen:In times of rapid growth of new media as an economic factor, the danger of creating a stagnating cultural ghetto is immediate. The aim of Tulipomania was not to express “Schadensfreude” towards all those who gambled – and lost, nor to mobilize resentment towards the steadily growing number of Internet millionaires. The conference was neither organised to call for state-lead interventionism against the monopolizing tendencies of the narrow ‘winner-takes-all’ business model promoted through the DotCom hype. There is enough (self)confidence to leave these easy anxieties aside and appeal to a much more powerful, temporary, networked collaborative imagination. Technical skills are no longer enough. Unlike perhaps five or ten years ago, we need a firm, broad, critical, compassionate knowledge of the Internet economy, one in which analysis opens a multitude of possibilities for involvement.